Australia
Responses to Robodebt, administrative review, and executive accountability.
Around the world, governments and institutions are developing new responses to algorithmic harm—but the legal terrain is uneven and constantly changing.
Part II of Mason and Hall's 2025 book surveys the emerging international landscape of AI and algorithm-related laws, policies, and regulatory frameworks. The authors place these efforts beside the book's central argument: the legal response matters, but care can also be designed into systems before harm occurs.
Different jurisdictions are taking different approaches, and legal instruments vary in force: enacted statutes, proposed bills, guidance, and voluntary frameworks are not interchangeable.
Responses to Robodebt, administrative review, and executive accountability.
Digital Services Act, Digital Markets Act, EU AI Act, and GDPR.
Developing approaches to AI governance and proposed legislation.
National policy and legislative initiatives concerning AI and automated systems.
AI strategy and governance approaches.
Lessons and reforms associated with the childcare benefits scandal.
AI regulatory approaches and the continuing implications of Horizon IT.
Privacy, guidelines, and a range of federal and state-level initiatives.
Governance frameworks and policy development.
The book's appendix also explores AI being used in legal and regulatory processes, including discussions of China's smart courts and the United Arab Emirates' regulatory intelligence system. This raises another layer of the duty-of-care question: what safeguards are needed when technology helps shape or administer law itself?
This page describes the topics surveyed in the 2025 first edition of Algorithmic Duty of Care. It is not a statement that every proposed law was enacted or that each country's legal position remains unchanged in 2026. Current compliance decisions require checking authoritative, up-to-date sources in each jurisdiction.